Everybody eats a diet of one kind or another, but when we talk of dieting it usually refers to the process of losing weight through eliminating certain food groups from your diet or concentrating on eating particular foods. This is not a particularly healthy way to approach weight loss, but many people get sucked in by the thought of losing vast amounts of weight in a short space of time, even though they know that the reality is that either they won't ever get down to their target weight or else they will most probably put the weight they lose back on. Indeed, there are at least 10 reasons not to diet.
1. Dieting means following a restrictive eating plan, which means you simply end up thinking about all the foods you are not allowed to eat. Some fad diets involve eating only one type of food, such as in the case of the cabbage soup diet, which means you won't be getting all the nutrients your body needs.
2. Connected with not getting enough nutrients is the fact that you will have very low energy levels, which is particularly unhelpful when you are trying to lose weight, since as well as cutting down on the calories you consume you should also be incorporating more exercise into your routine. If you don't have the energy to exercise you are likely to put off doing any, and may find yourself snacking on high-calorie junk food instead
3. Because you won't have much energy the chances are you will be extremely irritable and are therefore more likely to snap at people who haven't done anything to deserve it. Consequently being on a diet makes you less sociable, and people may be less willing to spend time with you.
4. You may also find it difficult to sleep when you are on a diet, particularly if you go to bed hungry.
5. Dieting can affect your metabolism as if you are consuming too few calories your body will go into starvation mode, and when you return to your normal eating patterns it will do everything in its power to hold on to the energy it is being provided with.
6. You also need to consider why you are dieting in the first place since you might think that being ultra-slim will make you feel better about yourself, but this is not necessarily the case. You might get a temporary boost to your self-esteem, but losing weight doesn't fundamentally change how you feel about yourself.
7. Indeed, thinking that losing weight is going to be the solution to all your problems increases the chance that you will put off living life to the fullest until you lose some weight, which clearly doesn't benefit you, especially if you have always struggled with your weight.
8. In fact most people who follow diets end up yo-yo dieting, going from being heavy to being light many times throughout their lifetime, rather than stabilising and learning to control their weight.
9. Obviously yo-yo dieting isn't good for your health, and your body has to continually adjust to being given either too many or too few calories, playing havoc with your metabolism and making it harder to lose weight in the future.
10. On a more superficial level losing weight quickly by severely restricting your calorie intake can leave you with unsightly loose hanging skin, whilst your face may begin to show its age.
Clearly, then, there are few advantages to dieting, as in most cases it won't help you achieve your weight-loss goals, or will do so only temporarily. It can also damage your health by depriving your body of vital nutrients, as well as making you less fun to be around. Losing weight should involve getting fitter and healthier, and so you shouldn't simply try to lose as much weight as possible through dieting, since going on a diet will not help you achieve all of those aims.
Friday 29 May 2015
How To Tell If You're Dieting And Exercising Too Much
If you've neglected your health and fitness over the years then deciding to do something about it can be a positive step. Eating a balanced diet and making sure you exercise regularly can help you look good on the outside and feel better on the inside, yet sometimes people can take dieting and exercising too far. This is understandable when you receive compliments from friends and family about how good you are looking, and you don't want to let them down by regaining weight. You therefore end up pushing yourself harder and harder, but making yourself feel worse in the process. Before long, the compliments you were receiving can turn into anxious concerns.
The most obvious indicator that you have been dieting and exercising too much is your shrinking size. There are people who approach weight loss sensibly at first, losing a pound or two each week, but who become addicted to losing weight and the praise they receive. They make a few alterations to their diet so they consume fewer calories and increase the intensity and frequency of their workouts to enable them to lose weight even faster. If you take such action you could be on the verge of developing an eating disorder, as you become preoccupied with controlling the food you eat and doing a certain amount of exercise at specific times of day.
As soon as your routine is disrupted you can become irritable and anxious. You may avoid eating out, as you want to know exactly what you're eating and so feel uncomfortable in situations where you are not completely in control of the calories you consume. Whenever friends invite you out you try to avoid it because you feel that you can't afford to miss a gym session, otherwise you might jeopardise your weight loss.
Your whole life seems to revolve around diet and exercise, and because it is your sole focus it can have a detrimental impact on the people around you. They may feel neglected and may not even like being around you because of your obsession with weight, diet and exercise. You probably have low self-esteem which you project to other people, and may feel depressed because of the amount of pressure you're putting yourself under. You won't allow yourself a rest day and won't partake of any 'treats' and you start to question why you're trying to lose weight anyway, yet you still can't break from your routine.
If you feel that you are no longer in control of your eating and exercise habits perhaps you have taken your commitment to dieting and exercise too far, especially if it starts to have a detrimental impact on other areas of your life.
The most obvious indicator that you have been dieting and exercising too much is your shrinking size. There are people who approach weight loss sensibly at first, losing a pound or two each week, but who become addicted to losing weight and the praise they receive. They make a few alterations to their diet so they consume fewer calories and increase the intensity and frequency of their workouts to enable them to lose weight even faster. If you take such action you could be on the verge of developing an eating disorder, as you become preoccupied with controlling the food you eat and doing a certain amount of exercise at specific times of day.
As soon as your routine is disrupted you can become irritable and anxious. You may avoid eating out, as you want to know exactly what you're eating and so feel uncomfortable in situations where you are not completely in control of the calories you consume. Whenever friends invite you out you try to avoid it because you feel that you can't afford to miss a gym session, otherwise you might jeopardise your weight loss.
Your whole life seems to revolve around diet and exercise, and because it is your sole focus it can have a detrimental impact on the people around you. They may feel neglected and may not even like being around you because of your obsession with weight, diet and exercise. You probably have low self-esteem which you project to other people, and may feel depressed because of the amount of pressure you're putting yourself under. You won't allow yourself a rest day and won't partake of any 'treats' and you start to question why you're trying to lose weight anyway, yet you still can't break from your routine.
If you feel that you are no longer in control of your eating and exercise habits perhaps you have taken your commitment to dieting and exercise too far, especially if it starts to have a detrimental impact on other areas of your life.
Reasons To Avoid Celebrity Exercise Regimes
The rich and famous tend to have lot more resources at their disposal to help them stay looking good compared to us mere mortals. When they're not shooting their latest movie they have plenty of time to workout in their personal gym or to get their personal trainer to push them to their limits. They can afford to have their meals made specifically tailored to their needs and delivered to their homes so they don't have to stock up on food and contend with the urge to overeat. If all this fails they can always have all their lumps and bumps airbrushed out. This just isn't an option for us ordinary folk.
Knowing this won't stop people from being taken in by celebrity endorsements of various diet products, plans and groups, though. Everyone wants to be slimmer than they are, and when they are confronted with those enticing 'before' and 'after' pictures they want to believe that the product being advertised can be as successful for them as it was for the person promoting it.
There are always female celebrities (although usually at the lower end of the celebrity scale) who will sell their souls to make a quick buck. They usually tell the tale of how they gained so much weight during their pregnancy which they were unable to shift after giving birth, but then with the aid of this miraculous pill, diet plan, or piece of exercise equipment they lost the weight in no time.
People want to believe that there is a quick-fix to their weight problem, and when they see pictures of celebrities who were heavily pregnant one moment and then spotted just a couple of weeks later looking as skinny as ever it is hard not to believe that there isn't such a solution. However, appearances can be deceptive, and there is nothing to say that these women aren't wearing control underwear or that, as is often the case in Hollywood, they have had a little bit of help from the surgeon's knife.
Most people don't have the money to waste on cosmetic surgery just so they can lose weight in an instant, nor are they able to virtually starve themselves and workout at all hours of the day without it having a serious impact on their health and family life. Celebrities can afford to hire staff to look after their children, clean the house, and cook their food, which isn't a realistic option for most of us.
Although we might all prefer to be a bit slimmer, few people are prepared to go the lengths that celebrities do in order to stay ultra-skinny, as there are simply more important things in life than size and weight.
Knowing this won't stop people from being taken in by celebrity endorsements of various diet products, plans and groups, though. Everyone wants to be slimmer than they are, and when they are confronted with those enticing 'before' and 'after' pictures they want to believe that the product being advertised can be as successful for them as it was for the person promoting it.
There are always female celebrities (although usually at the lower end of the celebrity scale) who will sell their souls to make a quick buck. They usually tell the tale of how they gained so much weight during their pregnancy which they were unable to shift after giving birth, but then with the aid of this miraculous pill, diet plan, or piece of exercise equipment they lost the weight in no time.
People want to believe that there is a quick-fix to their weight problem, and when they see pictures of celebrities who were heavily pregnant one moment and then spotted just a couple of weeks later looking as skinny as ever it is hard not to believe that there isn't such a solution. However, appearances can be deceptive, and there is nothing to say that these women aren't wearing control underwear or that, as is often the case in Hollywood, they have had a little bit of help from the surgeon's knife.
Most people don't have the money to waste on cosmetic surgery just so they can lose weight in an instant, nor are they able to virtually starve themselves and workout at all hours of the day without it having a serious impact on their health and family life. Celebrities can afford to hire staff to look after their children, clean the house, and cook their food, which isn't a realistic option for most of us.
Although we might all prefer to be a bit slimmer, few people are prepared to go the lengths that celebrities do in order to stay ultra-skinny, as there are simply more important things in life than size and weight.
The Effects of Poverty on School Education
Poverty, whether absolute or relative, permeates every aspect of an individual's life, including their access to education and their experience of the education process itself. This is a disturbing fact when education is regarded by many as the best route of escaping poverty; to help individuals improve themselves and their lot in life, and ultimately to provide a better future for their own children. The situation is obviously more pronounced in developing countries, where education is not freely available to all children, with many becoming adults who are barely able to read and write. Even in many developed nations, though, there is a disparity between the education received by those from affluent backgrounds and those who are not.
This seems to be less of a problem in Scandinavian countries that take a more egalitarian approach to education, which is why Finland, for instance, continues to receive such high ratings in international comparisons of educational systems. In nations such as the United Kingdom and the United States, though, it is hard to ignore the persistent differences in educational attainment between young people from disadvantaged backgrounds and those from more privileged backgrounds.
Meritocratic societies are based on the fundamental notion that success is dependent on ability and talent, not class privilege and wealth, yet this is not borne out by statistics, which illustrate how children from poorer families are not as successful as their richer counterparts when it comes to examination results and the chances of going into higher education. Indeed, in the United Kingdom the gap between the richest and poorest in society has grown over the past few decades, and social mobility has been severely stymied by the systematic failure of governments to address the real issues of poverty and education.
Children who grow up in poverty tend to live in deprived areas within their town or city, sometimes in single-parent families. Often their parents have had a limited education themselves, and although they may want a better life for their children find they do not have the means to facilitate this. They cannot afford private schools, and unlike middle-class parents they are not as able to manipulate the system to their advantage.
Whilst affluent parents are likely to do anything possible to get their children into the best schools, most parents who are struggling to make ends meet are less likely to actively help their children get into to the best schools, meaning they often just put up with what they are given. The fact is that the children who would benefit most from getting into the best schools are those from poorer backgrounds, particularly if their own parents find it difficult to assist them with homework and extracurricular activities, and yet the odds of them getting into such schools are stacked against them.
Although lack of money is a significant component of poverty, it is not the only one, as the culture which develops out of poverty means that many children do not believe it is worth their while to attend school and have few aspirations to escape the poverty they are in, especially if they do not even realise they are living in poverty. Consequently, they put little effort into their school work, seeing it as a waste of time, and so leave school with few qualifications. Some drift into crime, others find themselves in unskilled, manual jobs with little job security. The education they obtained as children will continue to shape their lives well into adulthood, and will impact upon their own progeny, thus making it extremely difficult to break the cycle of poverty.
This seems to be less of a problem in Scandinavian countries that take a more egalitarian approach to education, which is why Finland, for instance, continues to receive such high ratings in international comparisons of educational systems. In nations such as the United Kingdom and the United States, though, it is hard to ignore the persistent differences in educational attainment between young people from disadvantaged backgrounds and those from more privileged backgrounds.
Meritocratic societies are based on the fundamental notion that success is dependent on ability and talent, not class privilege and wealth, yet this is not borne out by statistics, which illustrate how children from poorer families are not as successful as their richer counterparts when it comes to examination results and the chances of going into higher education. Indeed, in the United Kingdom the gap between the richest and poorest in society has grown over the past few decades, and social mobility has been severely stymied by the systematic failure of governments to address the real issues of poverty and education.
Children who grow up in poverty tend to live in deprived areas within their town or city, sometimes in single-parent families. Often their parents have had a limited education themselves, and although they may want a better life for their children find they do not have the means to facilitate this. They cannot afford private schools, and unlike middle-class parents they are not as able to manipulate the system to their advantage.
Whilst affluent parents are likely to do anything possible to get their children into the best schools, most parents who are struggling to make ends meet are less likely to actively help their children get into to the best schools, meaning they often just put up with what they are given. The fact is that the children who would benefit most from getting into the best schools are those from poorer backgrounds, particularly if their own parents find it difficult to assist them with homework and extracurricular activities, and yet the odds of them getting into such schools are stacked against them.
Although lack of money is a significant component of poverty, it is not the only one, as the culture which develops out of poverty means that many children do not believe it is worth their while to attend school and have few aspirations to escape the poverty they are in, especially if they do not even realise they are living in poverty. Consequently, they put little effort into their school work, seeing it as a waste of time, and so leave school with few qualifications. Some drift into crime, others find themselves in unskilled, manual jobs with little job security. The education they obtained as children will continue to shape their lives well into adulthood, and will impact upon their own progeny, thus making it extremely difficult to break the cycle of poverty.
Gender Stereotypes Used in Advertising
Gender stereotypes are useful for advertisers because they are something which the audience is familiar with, and which act as a cultural point of reference. The audience almost expects women to be portrayed as motherly types or as sex goddesses, and for men to be swaggeringly macho or comically weak and ineffectual. Using stereotypes would appear to make it much easier for advertisers to sell their product to a particular target market because the people who see their advertisement are instantly aware whether that particular product is relevant to them or not.
Advertisements featuring women as mother figures tend to promote products relating to the home, children, and health. Women in such advertisements are portrayed as putting others before themselves, and doing the best for the family. They take care of the children, make sure the house is clean, and cook all the meals.
At the other extreme, women are portrayed as being slightly vampish. They want to attract men, and to do so in any way possible. Beauty and hair-care products are presented as the best way for women to make the most of themselves, and usually feature attractive, slim, and flawless women wearing the most flattering clothing. Sometimes it is hard to remember that these advertisements are actually aimed at women. It is because advertisers want their female audience to aspire to be as beautiful and successful as the women in the advertisements are presented as being.
Although there has been a tendency to focus on the use of women in advertisements as sex objects, it is not unusual for men also to be used for their looks. Advertisements for razors, aftershave, cars, jeans and even Diet Coke have all employed the services of good-looking men to sell a product. These are supposed to be 'real' mean, who are naturally muscular and good with their hands. They care about how the way they look and smell, but not excessively so. In contrast there are those advertisements where men are presented as useless at traditionally 'manly' tasks, having to rely on their wives to fulfil simple DIY tasks, for instance.
There are some advertisements in which male and female roles are reversed without actually focusing specifically on the issue of gender, but simply used as a way to reflect a more realistic viewpoint for most people. The majority of advertisers rely on perpetuating traditional gender stereotypes, though, because such stereotypes make it possible for them to reach their specified audience without having to expend much energy on thinking of new ways to appeal to people. Obviously anyone who fails to fit into these narrow gender categories are not the priority of advertisers for a reason and, in the end, it usually comes down to money.
Advertisements featuring women as mother figures tend to promote products relating to the home, children, and health. Women in such advertisements are portrayed as putting others before themselves, and doing the best for the family. They take care of the children, make sure the house is clean, and cook all the meals.
At the other extreme, women are portrayed as being slightly vampish. They want to attract men, and to do so in any way possible. Beauty and hair-care products are presented as the best way for women to make the most of themselves, and usually feature attractive, slim, and flawless women wearing the most flattering clothing. Sometimes it is hard to remember that these advertisements are actually aimed at women. It is because advertisers want their female audience to aspire to be as beautiful and successful as the women in the advertisements are presented as being.
Although there has been a tendency to focus on the use of women in advertisements as sex objects, it is not unusual for men also to be used for their looks. Advertisements for razors, aftershave, cars, jeans and even Diet Coke have all employed the services of good-looking men to sell a product. These are supposed to be 'real' mean, who are naturally muscular and good with their hands. They care about how the way they look and smell, but not excessively so. In contrast there are those advertisements where men are presented as useless at traditionally 'manly' tasks, having to rely on their wives to fulfil simple DIY tasks, for instance.
There are some advertisements in which male and female roles are reversed without actually focusing specifically on the issue of gender, but simply used as a way to reflect a more realistic viewpoint for most people. The majority of advertisers rely on perpetuating traditional gender stereotypes, though, because such stereotypes make it possible for them to reach their specified audience without having to expend much energy on thinking of new ways to appeal to people. Obviously anyone who fails to fit into these narrow gender categories are not the priority of advertisers for a reason and, in the end, it usually comes down to money.
How the Media is Altering Our Perception of Beuaty
There have always been visual representations of beauty which have shifted over time. You only have to look at portraits and paintings from across the centuries to see how fashions and perceptions of beauty have altered. There is now a more pernicious state of affairs in how the perception of beauty is shaped because the mass media not only reflects what is regarded as beautiful; it also shapes our perceptions of beauty.
This is not surprising because we live in a 24/7 consumer society in which we demand to know what's going on all day and everyday. Consequently, the media has extended its role and its influence over people, making it hard for people to get away from the images they are shown and to challenge what they are being told.
Beauty as is it stands currently seems to be influenced by how thin a person is. Celebrities seem to represent success; and from actors to musicians there seems to be a consensus that thin is more beautiful than being larger. There is a good chance that many celebrities are actually underweight, and so hardly the epitome of healthiness, yet for many teenage girls these celebrities have a physique to aspire to.
No longer is uniqueness and difference celebrated. Celebrities are all pruned, cleaned, polished, nipped, tucked and coiffed to ensure that they portray perfection'. We are left with identikit celebrities walking down the red carpet, with their unnaturally shiny white teeth gleaming and their perfectly smooth hair not moving an inch. Apparently this is beauty, and such images are inflicted upon the public. Impressionable individuals, especially young girls and teenagers develop unrealistic expectations of what they should look like, and tend to feel bad about themselves if they cannot achieve 'perfection'.
Fame and success seem to be inextricably linked with thinness, and young people can develop the belief that if they, too, slim down, there is perhaps hope that they can succeed. It is a rather simplistic connection, but it is one which the images shown in the media seem to confirm, making it difficult for those who do not conform to such an image to feel good about themselves. Beauty is portrayed as simply being about the external, physical appearance of an individual rather than the overall impression of beauty as both being inside and out.
The media seems to be particularly obsessed with images of thinness and conversely extreme fatness, with the former regarded as beautiful' and the latter as distasteful. Of course, people should aim to be a healthy weight, but more importantly they should accept themselves as they are. However, the media is so dominant in all our lives it can be extremely difficult to ignore the pressure that is placed on us to conform to a very narrow definition of beauty.
This is not surprising because we live in a 24/7 consumer society in which we demand to know what's going on all day and everyday. Consequently, the media has extended its role and its influence over people, making it hard for people to get away from the images they are shown and to challenge what they are being told.
Beauty as is it stands currently seems to be influenced by how thin a person is. Celebrities seem to represent success; and from actors to musicians there seems to be a consensus that thin is more beautiful than being larger. There is a good chance that many celebrities are actually underweight, and so hardly the epitome of healthiness, yet for many teenage girls these celebrities have a physique to aspire to.
No longer is uniqueness and difference celebrated. Celebrities are all pruned, cleaned, polished, nipped, tucked and coiffed to ensure that they portray perfection'. We are left with identikit celebrities walking down the red carpet, with their unnaturally shiny white teeth gleaming and their perfectly smooth hair not moving an inch. Apparently this is beauty, and such images are inflicted upon the public. Impressionable individuals, especially young girls and teenagers develop unrealistic expectations of what they should look like, and tend to feel bad about themselves if they cannot achieve 'perfection'.
Fame and success seem to be inextricably linked with thinness, and young people can develop the belief that if they, too, slim down, there is perhaps hope that they can succeed. It is a rather simplistic connection, but it is one which the images shown in the media seem to confirm, making it difficult for those who do not conform to such an image to feel good about themselves. Beauty is portrayed as simply being about the external, physical appearance of an individual rather than the overall impression of beauty as both being inside and out.
The media seems to be particularly obsessed with images of thinness and conversely extreme fatness, with the former regarded as beautiful' and the latter as distasteful. Of course, people should aim to be a healthy weight, but more importantly they should accept themselves as they are. However, the media is so dominant in all our lives it can be extremely difficult to ignore the pressure that is placed on us to conform to a very narrow definition of beauty.
The Debate Around Child Beauty Pageants
There has always been an expectation on women to make the most of themselves and to look good, but it seems that this is being extended to young girls when really they would be better off playing outside, not focusing on what they look like and how to cover up their supposed flaws. Children are being sexualised at a younger age, and the beauty pageant world seems to increase the pressure that is placed on young girls to spend a significant amount of time on their appearance in order to look older than their years. Most women may be trying to hold back the years, but they seem to have no qualms in getting their children to wear provocative outfits and wear makeup in order to appear as if they are young women, rather than children.
The debate surrounding children's beauty pageants therefore stems from a concern that young girls are being exploited to make money for the pageant's organisers and in order to fulfil the wishes of parents, particularly mothers. In so doing these women help to perpetuate the notion that the female of the species is designed to be judged by their exterior and not for their character or ability. Of course, women who take their daughters to beauty pageants will be quick to defend their actions. As far as they are concerned their daughters are learning grace, poise, manners, and gaining confidence on the public stage. All little girls love playing 'dress up', so why shouldn't they be able to dress up before walking out on stage, with the added bonus that they might actually win a prize?
However, do beauty pageants really boost the confidence of youngsters? The majority of teenagers and young women have poor body image and low self-esteem, and are very conscious of how they are perceived by their peers. Beauty pageants for children surely emphasise how much appearance matters. For those who fail to measure up to an unrealistic standard there is a good chance they may feel as if they have failed, and because they have become defined by their looks, it can be difficult for them to feel good about themselves as they approach adolescence.
Children shouldn't be worrying about how they look, since it's not as if they should be aiming to attract members of the opposite sex at such a young age, anyway, and so they should be able to enjoy running around getting dirty without being too preoccupied with their appearance. Beauty pageants run contrary to this line of thought, though, as their whole reason for being is to promote a very restricted conception of beauty which girls have to conform to in order to be successful. With so much emphasis on beauty' this must eventually have a detrimental effect on the individuals concerned as well as perpetuating a certain notion of femininity which doesn't necessarily ring true.
The debate surrounding children's beauty pageants therefore stems from a concern that young girls are being exploited to make money for the pageant's organisers and in order to fulfil the wishes of parents, particularly mothers. In so doing these women help to perpetuate the notion that the female of the species is designed to be judged by their exterior and not for their character or ability. Of course, women who take their daughters to beauty pageants will be quick to defend their actions. As far as they are concerned their daughters are learning grace, poise, manners, and gaining confidence on the public stage. All little girls love playing 'dress up', so why shouldn't they be able to dress up before walking out on stage, with the added bonus that they might actually win a prize?
However, do beauty pageants really boost the confidence of youngsters? The majority of teenagers and young women have poor body image and low self-esteem, and are very conscious of how they are perceived by their peers. Beauty pageants for children surely emphasise how much appearance matters. For those who fail to measure up to an unrealistic standard there is a good chance they may feel as if they have failed, and because they have become defined by their looks, it can be difficult for them to feel good about themselves as they approach adolescence.
Children shouldn't be worrying about how they look, since it's not as if they should be aiming to attract members of the opposite sex at such a young age, anyway, and so they should be able to enjoy running around getting dirty without being too preoccupied with their appearance. Beauty pageants run contrary to this line of thought, though, as their whole reason for being is to promote a very restricted conception of beauty which girls have to conform to in order to be successful. With so much emphasis on beauty' this must eventually have a detrimental effect on the individuals concerned as well as perpetuating a certain notion of femininity which doesn't necessarily ring true.
How Celebrities Influence Teenagers
Teenagers are bound to be influenced by celebrities to some degree, simply because it is impossible to escape celebrity culture. The media is fixated on what celebrities are doing, so that even the most respectable newspapers end up covering celebrity-related stories. Many teenagers want to become celebrities themselves, as they see the celebrity lifestyle as glamorous and sexy. When there are many celebrities who are famous for doing nothing, it isn’t surprising that many teenagers think that if they become a celebrity, they will have an easy life.
Some teenagers are not prepared to knuckle-down and work hard at school because they become convinced that they can make their fortune by appearing on American Idol or some other ‘talent’ show. Of course, many teenagers will grow out of this phase and realise that they have to actually do something with their lives, rather than continually follow a dream that is unlikely to come true. There are some who won’t face up to this reality, though, and who believe that eventually they will get the fame they deserve.
Body image is an issue for teenagers and here celebrities have some influence, particularly over girls. It is very unusual to see celebrities carrying a bit of extra weight and those who do are often the subject of derision. Whenever a celebrity is photographed by the paparazzi looking less than glamorous, with no make-up, a flabby stomach and visible cellulite, there will no doubt be sarcastic comments made by the ‘journalist’ writing the ‘story’. A few weeks later the same celebrity will be photographed looking ultra-svelte and sophisticated.
Celebrities feel the pressure to stay slim and to make the most of their appearance, which is something that teenage girls and, to a lesser extent, teenage boys feel. The media obsession with celebrity, particularly how celebrities look, may not create eating disorders, but it is certainly influencing how teenagers feel about their own bodies.
Teenagers are comparing themselves to impossibly perfect celebrities who all have their own stylists on hand to help them look good. It is when these celebrities leave the house without their personal entourage that they are snapped looking less than perfect! These aren’t the images that teenagers tend to pay attention to, though, as they have a tendency to look at images of celebrities who always look good, which just makes them feel bad about their own appearance.
There may be some teenagers who eschew celebrity culture, but when celebrities are used to advertise anything and everything and even pop up in news stories, it is very difficult to escape the power of celebrity. It is even tougher for teenagers than adults, as they are often desperate to fit in with their peers who may have a greater interest in celebrity-related matters.
Some teenagers are not prepared to knuckle-down and work hard at school because they become convinced that they can make their fortune by appearing on American Idol or some other ‘talent’ show. Of course, many teenagers will grow out of this phase and realise that they have to actually do something with their lives, rather than continually follow a dream that is unlikely to come true. There are some who won’t face up to this reality, though, and who believe that eventually they will get the fame they deserve.
Body image is an issue for teenagers and here celebrities have some influence, particularly over girls. It is very unusual to see celebrities carrying a bit of extra weight and those who do are often the subject of derision. Whenever a celebrity is photographed by the paparazzi looking less than glamorous, with no make-up, a flabby stomach and visible cellulite, there will no doubt be sarcastic comments made by the ‘journalist’ writing the ‘story’. A few weeks later the same celebrity will be photographed looking ultra-svelte and sophisticated.
Celebrities feel the pressure to stay slim and to make the most of their appearance, which is something that teenage girls and, to a lesser extent, teenage boys feel. The media obsession with celebrity, particularly how celebrities look, may not create eating disorders, but it is certainly influencing how teenagers feel about their own bodies.
Teenagers are comparing themselves to impossibly perfect celebrities who all have their own stylists on hand to help them look good. It is when these celebrities leave the house without their personal entourage that they are snapped looking less than perfect! These aren’t the images that teenagers tend to pay attention to, though, as they have a tendency to look at images of celebrities who always look good, which just makes them feel bad about their own appearance.
There may be some teenagers who eschew celebrity culture, but when celebrities are used to advertise anything and everything and even pop up in news stories, it is very difficult to escape the power of celebrity. It is even tougher for teenagers than adults, as they are often desperate to fit in with their peers who may have a greater interest in celebrity-related matters.
Why Punctuality is Important in the Workplace
It is important to be punctual for work, as being late all the time is going to leave your co-workers with a rather negative impression of you. You may be perceived as somewhat of a slacker, who only crawls out of bed and into work when you really have to. This could result in your wages being docked and if you are regularly late you could even be fired from your position. Even if you have job where no clocking on is involved, frequently turning up to meetings and appointments late isn't going to win you any fans.
Punctuality is therefore incredibly important in the workplace, as you are not the only one who has to turn up for work. If your colleagues can make it to work on time there is no excuse why you should not be able to. It ought to be the same for everyone and so it is not very fair for you to turn up late more or less every day. Being late is disrespectful to the people you work with, since you are a member of a team, and to clients and customers who you are supposed to meet with.
Everyone has a schedule to keep and your inability to be punctual not only affects you, it affects all the people you have to deal with on a day-to-day basis. If you’re punctual it shows that you are considerate of other people’s needs and that you are able to plan your time effectively. Clearly, if you’re turning up for work on time you can get more work done than if you’re often running behind schedule, trying to catch up on work that should have been started earlier on in the day.
Punctuality is something you need to possess if you are to succeed in the workplace, as it demonstrates that you are a dependable character, which offers reassurance to co-workers and clients. Managers obviously favour employees who can arrive at work on time over those who make excuses for being late. If you are always on time, at least you cannot be criticised for being late and if you decide to apply for promotion this certainly won’t hurt your chances of success.
For any kind of organisation to run successfully, it depends on the commitment and good time-keeping skills of its employees. If everyone were to turn up to work when they felt like it, mayhem would ensue. The importance of punctuality in the workplace should therefore not be underestimated.
Punctuality is therefore incredibly important in the workplace, as you are not the only one who has to turn up for work. If your colleagues can make it to work on time there is no excuse why you should not be able to. It ought to be the same for everyone and so it is not very fair for you to turn up late more or less every day. Being late is disrespectful to the people you work with, since you are a member of a team, and to clients and customers who you are supposed to meet with.
Everyone has a schedule to keep and your inability to be punctual not only affects you, it affects all the people you have to deal with on a day-to-day basis. If you’re punctual it shows that you are considerate of other people’s needs and that you are able to plan your time effectively. Clearly, if you’re turning up for work on time you can get more work done than if you’re often running behind schedule, trying to catch up on work that should have been started earlier on in the day.
Punctuality is something you need to possess if you are to succeed in the workplace, as it demonstrates that you are a dependable character, which offers reassurance to co-workers and clients. Managers obviously favour employees who can arrive at work on time over those who make excuses for being late. If you are always on time, at least you cannot be criticised for being late and if you decide to apply for promotion this certainly won’t hurt your chances of success.
For any kind of organisation to run successfully, it depends on the commitment and good time-keeping skills of its employees. If everyone were to turn up to work when they felt like it, mayhem would ensue. The importance of punctuality in the workplace should therefore not be underestimated.
Why do People Eat Junk Food When They Know it's Bad for Them
One of the problems with today's society is that everybody is so busy rushing around that they don't take the time to look after themselves by eating a balanced diet and exercising regularly. Too often food is eaten on the go and is chosen because it is quick and easy to prepare rather than for its nutritional content. Junk food has become a part of most people's life, and the evidence is plain to see as more people are becoming obese and their health suffering as a result of their weight. Despite the fact that junk food is bad for people's health most continue to eat junk food, but why?
People who consume large quantities of junk food - food which is high in calories, but low in nutritional value - are more likely to become obese, to develop diabetes, heart disease and certain cancers. Their mental health may also suffer, as if they have a weight problem they could also have low self-esteem, whilst junk food tends to contain a lot of sugar which can be addictive. It is not unusual for people to suffer mood swings and cravings for sugar-laden foods when they have not had a sugar-fix. This may be one reason why people eat junk food even though they know it's bad for them, as they have a compulsion to.
How do they get hooked in the first place, though? It is usually family and friends who introduce them to junk food, and parents have a particular responsibility to ensure their children eat well. It seems that they may well be failing, though, as childhood obesity levels rise, and since adults seem to be having such a hard time controlling their own weight it is not surprising that they hand their bad habits on to their children. If parents eat a lot of junk food, the chances are their children will, too, and children can't be accused of knowing that junk food is bad for them if they are simply emulating their elders.
Parents, however, lead busy lives and find stopping off at McDonald's or Burger King for some fries and burger less burdensome than having to cook a meal from scratch. There is also the added bonus that fast food usually tastes pretty good, and isn't all that expensive. It is not unusual to enter a supermarket and see convenience meals, chocolate bars, cakes, biscuits, sweets, and crisps on special offer, and they generally look more appetising than the apples and oranges on display.
Indeed, advertising can play a role in getting people to buy junk food and fast food in the first place if they see an advertisement for a new product, particularly if it is cheap, and may want to try it as a result. Once they've tried it, they may find themselves going back for it again and again. This can be a particular problem for those who have a habit of comfort eating - they don't usually reach for healthy options, but rather junk food, since it tastes good and makes them feel good for a short time, and so stocking up on junk food is simply asking for trouble if they are unable to control their urges.
There are a number of reasons why people continue to eat junk food despite knowing it's bad for them, which isn't a problem when they are able to moderate their intake. The trouble is that most people seem to be eating too much junk food which is affecting their weight and their health. It is these individuals who have to learn to control whatever it is that makes them want to eat junk food all the time, so they can find a way to resist the constant temptation of it.
People who consume large quantities of junk food - food which is high in calories, but low in nutritional value - are more likely to become obese, to develop diabetes, heart disease and certain cancers. Their mental health may also suffer, as if they have a weight problem they could also have low self-esteem, whilst junk food tends to contain a lot of sugar which can be addictive. It is not unusual for people to suffer mood swings and cravings for sugar-laden foods when they have not had a sugar-fix. This may be one reason why people eat junk food even though they know it's bad for them, as they have a compulsion to.
How do they get hooked in the first place, though? It is usually family and friends who introduce them to junk food, and parents have a particular responsibility to ensure their children eat well. It seems that they may well be failing, though, as childhood obesity levels rise, and since adults seem to be having such a hard time controlling their own weight it is not surprising that they hand their bad habits on to their children. If parents eat a lot of junk food, the chances are their children will, too, and children can't be accused of knowing that junk food is bad for them if they are simply emulating their elders.
Parents, however, lead busy lives and find stopping off at McDonald's or Burger King for some fries and burger less burdensome than having to cook a meal from scratch. There is also the added bonus that fast food usually tastes pretty good, and isn't all that expensive. It is not unusual to enter a supermarket and see convenience meals, chocolate bars, cakes, biscuits, sweets, and crisps on special offer, and they generally look more appetising than the apples and oranges on display.
Indeed, advertising can play a role in getting people to buy junk food and fast food in the first place if they see an advertisement for a new product, particularly if it is cheap, and may want to try it as a result. Once they've tried it, they may find themselves going back for it again and again. This can be a particular problem for those who have a habit of comfort eating - they don't usually reach for healthy options, but rather junk food, since it tastes good and makes them feel good for a short time, and so stocking up on junk food is simply asking for trouble if they are unable to control their urges.
There are a number of reasons why people continue to eat junk food despite knowing it's bad for them, which isn't a problem when they are able to moderate their intake. The trouble is that most people seem to be eating too much junk food which is affecting their weight and their health. It is these individuals who have to learn to control whatever it is that makes them want to eat junk food all the time, so they can find a way to resist the constant temptation of it.
Technology: Its Effect on Children
Technology has had a profound impact on all sections of society, as products and services which were formerly only available to the very rich have been adopted by wider society. This is a result of rising disposable income levels and the fact that new technologies have been getting cheaper. There have been significant implications for the social structure and for how people relate to one another because of the increasing reliance on technology. Nowhere is this more evident than amongst children who have only ever known a technology-driven society which they take for granted.
Most children in the Western world are extremely technologically-savvy, and all have the latest gizmos and gadgets, or at least try to pester their parents into getting them the latest inventions. There is a lot of peer pressure involved when it comes to technology, as youngsters increasingly communicate with their friends on social networking websites and by text messaging. At this rate the next generation of adults will have lost the art of good conversation, being forced to rely on text speak!
Children from poorer families run the risk of being alienated for not being able to afford the latest technological innovations. They may be picked on, or be excluded from conversations, and so feel isolated. However, even those with the latest innovations may find themselves unable to escape bullying and taunts. With mobile phones and instant messaging, often bullying can continue outside of the school gates, as bullies are able to access their victims at all times. Clearly this is distressing for the children who are involved, and although bullying has always happened, now children cannot escape even when they are at home.
Children seem to be completely dependent on technology, which is unsurprising since schools have embraced computers and electronic whiteboards to help teachers take a twenty-first century approach to lessons. What children are being taught is no better or worse than it was in the past, but it does give the impression that computers can solve anything and should be used for everything, perhaps making it more difficult for children to learn in more conventional, old-fashioned ways, as their attention spans become shorter.
In fact many children cannot be bothered with reading when they can simply watch the film when they get home. The majority of children have televisions and DVD players in their room from a young age, meaning that parents are often not in control of what their children are watching. It also means that there is rarely a time when a child is not sat in front of a computer or television screen, when it would be good for them to go outside and run around now and again.
Of course, technology has made life a lot easier for people, but it is easy to become over-reliant on technology, so that when things go wrong they do not know how to cope. This is even more so in the case of children, who may find it difficult to appreciate what life would be like without the availability of certain gadgets. Communication may also become a problem for some children if they only ever talk with others online or by text messaging, and so it is important for parents to try to strike the right balance between allowing their child to possess new technologies, but also to gain experience of the outside world.
Most children in the Western world are extremely technologically-savvy, and all have the latest gizmos and gadgets, or at least try to pester their parents into getting them the latest inventions. There is a lot of peer pressure involved when it comes to technology, as youngsters increasingly communicate with their friends on social networking websites and by text messaging. At this rate the next generation of adults will have lost the art of good conversation, being forced to rely on text speak!
Children from poorer families run the risk of being alienated for not being able to afford the latest technological innovations. They may be picked on, or be excluded from conversations, and so feel isolated. However, even those with the latest innovations may find themselves unable to escape bullying and taunts. With mobile phones and instant messaging, often bullying can continue outside of the school gates, as bullies are able to access their victims at all times. Clearly this is distressing for the children who are involved, and although bullying has always happened, now children cannot escape even when they are at home.
Children seem to be completely dependent on technology, which is unsurprising since schools have embraced computers and electronic whiteboards to help teachers take a twenty-first century approach to lessons. What children are being taught is no better or worse than it was in the past, but it does give the impression that computers can solve anything and should be used for everything, perhaps making it more difficult for children to learn in more conventional, old-fashioned ways, as their attention spans become shorter.
In fact many children cannot be bothered with reading when they can simply watch the film when they get home. The majority of children have televisions and DVD players in their room from a young age, meaning that parents are often not in control of what their children are watching. It also means that there is rarely a time when a child is not sat in front of a computer or television screen, when it would be good for them to go outside and run around now and again.
Of course, technology has made life a lot easier for people, but it is easy to become over-reliant on technology, so that when things go wrong they do not know how to cope. This is even more so in the case of children, who may find it difficult to appreciate what life would be like without the availability of certain gadgets. Communication may also become a problem for some children if they only ever talk with others online or by text messaging, and so it is important for parents to try to strike the right balance between allowing their child to possess new technologies, but also to gain experience of the outside world.
Benefits of Being a Multicultural Society
A multicultural society is one in which different cultures exist alongside each other, often intermingling and incorporating a variety of aspects that define other cultures. Out of this cultural-blending comes a greater respect for each other's culture, tolerance and a far more interesting and diverse society. In a multicultural society, individuals are able to practice whatever religion they choose, to wear what they want, to eat what they want and engage in cultural practices that may not be fully understood by mainstream society.
In a multicultural society, immigrants have obviously played a significant role in shaping the cultural landscape, having brought with them their own beliefs and attitudes that shape their perception of their adopted nation. These individuals then pass their experiences and beliefs on to their children, encouraging them to follow various cultural practices which may differ from those practised by wider society. The children of immigrants grow up in a society where they learn about the world their parents came from and about the society they call home at school and from their friends.
This clearly makes for a more tolerant and open-minded society. Multi-culturalism enables different beliefs and value systems to co-exist, which means that positive aspects of one culture may be adopted by others to create a better society. In a globalised world, there is no place for isolation and discrimination, since to get ahead in life, individuals have to recognise both the similarities and differences that exist between various peoples. Multi-culturalism makes a society more open to change, as its social make-up is often in flux, as individuals move between societies.
As a consequence, individuals bring with them different experiences that can profoundly shape the society in which they have settled. A society's culture obviously reflects the experiences of its inhabitants, which is demonstrated throughout the literary world, in television, films and music. Individuals are exposed to a wide variety of cultures that often come together in a positive way, with multiculturalism often celebrated by liberal society. Youngsters grow up accepting that diversity is normal, that everyone is entitled to live life the way they want and that, at the end of the day, despite what clothes people wear and language they speak, people are all the same underneath.
There will always be those who maintain that multiculturalism has taken away a particular national identity, but national identities are never fixed and everyone has their own interpretation of what it means to belong to their nation. Some people may want to go back to a golden age, a time when society was more homogeneous and cohesive. There was no such age, though, as there has always been some degree of intermingling of cultures, even if it was less widespread. It is impossible to go backwards, anyway, and globalisation means that it is clearly better for individuals to be familiar with different cultures.
In a multicultural society, immigrants have obviously played a significant role in shaping the cultural landscape, having brought with them their own beliefs and attitudes that shape their perception of their adopted nation. These individuals then pass their experiences and beliefs on to their children, encouraging them to follow various cultural practices which may differ from those practised by wider society. The children of immigrants grow up in a society where they learn about the world their parents came from and about the society they call home at school and from their friends.
This clearly makes for a more tolerant and open-minded society. Multi-culturalism enables different beliefs and value systems to co-exist, which means that positive aspects of one culture may be adopted by others to create a better society. In a globalised world, there is no place for isolation and discrimination, since to get ahead in life, individuals have to recognise both the similarities and differences that exist between various peoples. Multi-culturalism makes a society more open to change, as its social make-up is often in flux, as individuals move between societies.
As a consequence, individuals bring with them different experiences that can profoundly shape the society in which they have settled. A society's culture obviously reflects the experiences of its inhabitants, which is demonstrated throughout the literary world, in television, films and music. Individuals are exposed to a wide variety of cultures that often come together in a positive way, with multiculturalism often celebrated by liberal society. Youngsters grow up accepting that diversity is normal, that everyone is entitled to live life the way they want and that, at the end of the day, despite what clothes people wear and language they speak, people are all the same underneath.
There will always be those who maintain that multiculturalism has taken away a particular national identity, but national identities are never fixed and everyone has their own interpretation of what it means to belong to their nation. Some people may want to go back to a golden age, a time when society was more homogeneous and cohesive. There was no such age, though, as there has always been some degree of intermingling of cultures, even if it was less widespread. It is impossible to go backwards, anyway, and globalisation means that it is clearly better for individuals to be familiar with different cultures.
Are Tanning Beds Safe for your Skin?
Lying down in the sun isn't safe for your skin, and the sun is about 93 millions miles away, so what is the likelihood that lying in a tanning bed, where the impact of the ultra violet rays is greater, will be safe for your skin?! People can kid themselves that if they're just in a tanning bed for a few minutes a day that the risks of them developing skin cancer are not great, but surely over a long period of time this risk increases significantly.
Tanning beds help to facilitate the production of melanin. This melanin is actually skin damage caused by ultra violet rays, which have been proven to cause all three types of skin cancer; basil cell sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Initially the tanning bed was developed to serve a medicinal purpose in the hope that increased sunlight could help those individuals with rickets and calcium deficiency disorders to develop stronger bones.
However, when some entrepreneurial figure came along and realised there was money to be made from an appearance-obsessed public the tanning bed became more about feeding people's vanity than any tenuous health benefits. Tans were, and still are, in fashion and tanning beds provide individuals with the opportunity to have a year-round tan without having to expose oneself in public and having to rely on the unpredictable weather (in the United Kingdom, at least!)
Not only are you at a greater risk of developing skin cancer from using tanning beds, your skin becomes wrinkly and leathery, helping you to age quicker. This is hardly a sign that tanning beds are good for your skin. You may well have a healthy' glow, but to many people it seems unnatural, and only provides short-term benefits since, after all you have to keep your tan topped-up'.
Indeed, some people find using tanning beds an addictive experience and end up looking excessively orange from overusing tanning beds. Such individuals are sometimes referred to as being tantastic' or tanorexic'. In some ways it easy to mock such individuals because they look so odd, but there are people with real problems who suffer pangs of guilt if they miss a tanning session.
This is why it is important to protect vulnerable, impressionable young people from believing that people look better with a perma-tan rather than just accepting their natural colour. It is only recently that the issue of tanning beds has been raised in the United Kingdom. The government is now leaning towards banning children under eighteen from using tanning beds and ensuring that tanning salons are staffed at all times with staff having to inform customers about potential risks of using tanning beds. This obviously does not preclude the use of tanning beds in individuals' homes, but it does begin to address this seeming obsession with being tanned all year round, and hopefully encouraging young people to think more about their health than their looks.
Tanning beds help to facilitate the production of melanin. This melanin is actually skin damage caused by ultra violet rays, which have been proven to cause all three types of skin cancer; basil cell sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Initially the tanning bed was developed to serve a medicinal purpose in the hope that increased sunlight could help those individuals with rickets and calcium deficiency disorders to develop stronger bones.
However, when some entrepreneurial figure came along and realised there was money to be made from an appearance-obsessed public the tanning bed became more about feeding people's vanity than any tenuous health benefits. Tans were, and still are, in fashion and tanning beds provide individuals with the opportunity to have a year-round tan without having to expose oneself in public and having to rely on the unpredictable weather (in the United Kingdom, at least!)
Not only are you at a greater risk of developing skin cancer from using tanning beds, your skin becomes wrinkly and leathery, helping you to age quicker. This is hardly a sign that tanning beds are good for your skin. You may well have a healthy' glow, but to many people it seems unnatural, and only provides short-term benefits since, after all you have to keep your tan topped-up'.
Indeed, some people find using tanning beds an addictive experience and end up looking excessively orange from overusing tanning beds. Such individuals are sometimes referred to as being tantastic' or tanorexic'. In some ways it easy to mock such individuals because they look so odd, but there are people with real problems who suffer pangs of guilt if they miss a tanning session.
This is why it is important to protect vulnerable, impressionable young people from believing that people look better with a perma-tan rather than just accepting their natural colour. It is only recently that the issue of tanning beds has been raised in the United Kingdom. The government is now leaning towards banning children under eighteen from using tanning beds and ensuring that tanning salons are staffed at all times with staff having to inform customers about potential risks of using tanning beds. This obviously does not preclude the use of tanning beds in individuals' homes, but it does begin to address this seeming obsession with being tanned all year round, and hopefully encouraging young people to think more about their health than their looks.
Why Perserverance is Essential in the Workplace
Perseverance is an essential quality to possess in the workplace, as there will be occasions when things don't quite go to plan and so you need to have the drive and determination to get your ideas across and to ensure that your projects go ahead. If you give up every time something unexpected occurs you will never get anything done and could find that your career doesn't progress in the way you want it to. If you persevere, however, failure is not an option and so you will keep trying until things turn out the way you wanted them to.
It is important to persevere in the workplace, as otherwise the temptation is to just give up. If someone unexpectedly quits, leaving a project half-completed, or you find that funding for your organisation has been withdrawn you can’t just ignore it. You have to take action to improve the situation, as no one else will. When other people are depending on you to deliver goods or services, you can't simply abandon them because something else has come up. You have to persevere and ensure that you employ someone else to get your project back on track and find some other way of securing funds.
Obviously, perseverance can help you at all levels. If you are in a low-skilled job where you get little thanks for your efforts you need to persevere when things go wrong, as you are bound to be the one that gets the blame, even when it’s not your fault. You're still the one who ends up correcting other people’s mistakes, though. If you persevere and stick with your job you may eventually have the extra work you've put in acknowledged by your boss, so that you end up being given a promotion.
Indeed, perseverance is an essential quality to possess in the workplace if you are to achieve your career goals and reach your full potential. If you’re higher up the career ladder you need to persevere so that you get your ideas listened to and your contribution recognised. If you're the kind of person who folds under pressure, this is hardly likely to make a good impression on the people you work for, especially if you intend to reach the top of your profession.
Thus, you have to learn to persevere in the workplace if you want to do a good job in whatever it is you do and, hopefully, end up in a position that reflects your capabilities.
It is important to persevere in the workplace, as otherwise the temptation is to just give up. If someone unexpectedly quits, leaving a project half-completed, or you find that funding for your organisation has been withdrawn you can’t just ignore it. You have to take action to improve the situation, as no one else will. When other people are depending on you to deliver goods or services, you can't simply abandon them because something else has come up. You have to persevere and ensure that you employ someone else to get your project back on track and find some other way of securing funds.
Obviously, perseverance can help you at all levels. If you are in a low-skilled job where you get little thanks for your efforts you need to persevere when things go wrong, as you are bound to be the one that gets the blame, even when it’s not your fault. You're still the one who ends up correcting other people’s mistakes, though. If you persevere and stick with your job you may eventually have the extra work you've put in acknowledged by your boss, so that you end up being given a promotion.
Indeed, perseverance is an essential quality to possess in the workplace if you are to achieve your career goals and reach your full potential. If you’re higher up the career ladder you need to persevere so that you get your ideas listened to and your contribution recognised. If you're the kind of person who folds under pressure, this is hardly likely to make a good impression on the people you work for, especially if you intend to reach the top of your profession.
Thus, you have to learn to persevere in the workplace if you want to do a good job in whatever it is you do and, hopefully, end up in a position that reflects your capabilities.
The Best Indie Movies of all Time
Independent films have the ability to be innovative and to push boundaries because the creative forces behind them do not have to satisfy criteria laid down by major studios and production companies. This often means they are low-budget affairs and often do not reach mainstream audiences, but this does not take away from the fact that the independent scene has produced some very good films.
SHALLOW GRAVE An extremely dark comedy drama with great performances from Christopher Eccleston, Ewan Mcgregor and Kerry Fox, and directed to perfection by Danny Boyle. It focuses on a group of roommates who find a lot of money in the room of their new tenant who just happens to have died, and their consequent decisions about what to do with the body and what to do with the money. It has a wickedly funny ending.
TRAINSPOTTING Another film directed by Danny Boyle starring Ewan Mcgregor, Jonny Lee Miller, Ewen Bremner and Kevin McKidd as a group of disaffected twenty-somethings use drugs to try to escape their Edinburgh existence.
DEAD MAN'S SHOES A stunning film from Shane Meadows and a brilliant performance from Paddy Considine. Considine plays a former soldier who returns home seeking vengeance against a group of people who abused his mentally impaired brother. It's a classic with a shockingly brutal ending.
RESERVOIR DOGS The film that introduced the world to Quentin Tarantino. It has an impressive cast list with the likes of Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen, Steve Buscemi and Tim Roth putting in stellar performances. A bank job goes wrong; could a mole be responsible for its failure?
MEMENTO A film that put Christopher Nolan on the map with a very simple yet effective story told backwards. It stars Guy Pearce as Leonard, who suffers from short-term memory loss and so cannot create new memories. He is forced to rely on the notes he writes himself and the tattoos on his body as he tries to uncover who murdered his wife.
CUBE A clever little sci-fi thriller following a group of unrelated people who wake up in a cube-shaped building with thousands of rooms and many traps. Using each of their skills (which they conveniently have) they try to negotiate these rooms and find an escape, but will human nature overwhelm their attempts to survive?
THE DESCENT An inventive little horror from Neil Marshall, director of Dog Soldiers. It begins with one of the main character's child and husband being killed in a dramatic car crash. Some time later she and her friends go on a trip which will involve caving. Not only do they have to confront the unknown creatures in the dark but also their inner demons.
THE EVIL DEAD A low budget, yet surprisingly effective horror from Sam Raimi who manages to utilise a multitude of camera techniques to great effect. The plot isn't as important as the atmosphere and the build-up of tension, as it basically focuses on a group of teenagers who go to a deserted cabin in the forest for a weekend away. Not exactly mind-blowing!
DONNIE DARKO A film that may give you a headache if you think about it too much. It follows Donnie Darko, an extremely troubled teenager, who sees a six foot rabbit called Frank who tells him that the world is going to end in twenty eight days. Is it all in his head or could his vision come true?
REQUIEM FOR A DREAM A powerful film about addiction with a soundtrack that complements it well. There are four intertwining stories of drug addiction as each individual is forced to face up to the reality of their situation. Great performances from Jared Leto, Ellen Burstyn and Jennifer Connelly.
SHALLOW GRAVE An extremely dark comedy drama with great performances from Christopher Eccleston, Ewan Mcgregor and Kerry Fox, and directed to perfection by Danny Boyle. It focuses on a group of roommates who find a lot of money in the room of their new tenant who just happens to have died, and their consequent decisions about what to do with the body and what to do with the money. It has a wickedly funny ending.
TRAINSPOTTING Another film directed by Danny Boyle starring Ewan Mcgregor, Jonny Lee Miller, Ewen Bremner and Kevin McKidd as a group of disaffected twenty-somethings use drugs to try to escape their Edinburgh existence.
DEAD MAN'S SHOES A stunning film from Shane Meadows and a brilliant performance from Paddy Considine. Considine plays a former soldier who returns home seeking vengeance against a group of people who abused his mentally impaired brother. It's a classic with a shockingly brutal ending.
RESERVOIR DOGS The film that introduced the world to Quentin Tarantino. It has an impressive cast list with the likes of Harvey Keitel, Michael Madsen, Steve Buscemi and Tim Roth putting in stellar performances. A bank job goes wrong; could a mole be responsible for its failure?
MEMENTO A film that put Christopher Nolan on the map with a very simple yet effective story told backwards. It stars Guy Pearce as Leonard, who suffers from short-term memory loss and so cannot create new memories. He is forced to rely on the notes he writes himself and the tattoos on his body as he tries to uncover who murdered his wife.
CUBE A clever little sci-fi thriller following a group of unrelated people who wake up in a cube-shaped building with thousands of rooms and many traps. Using each of their skills (which they conveniently have) they try to negotiate these rooms and find an escape, but will human nature overwhelm their attempts to survive?
THE DESCENT An inventive little horror from Neil Marshall, director of Dog Soldiers. It begins with one of the main character's child and husband being killed in a dramatic car crash. Some time later she and her friends go on a trip which will involve caving. Not only do they have to confront the unknown creatures in the dark but also their inner demons.
THE EVIL DEAD A low budget, yet surprisingly effective horror from Sam Raimi who manages to utilise a multitude of camera techniques to great effect. The plot isn't as important as the atmosphere and the build-up of tension, as it basically focuses on a group of teenagers who go to a deserted cabin in the forest for a weekend away. Not exactly mind-blowing!
DONNIE DARKO A film that may give you a headache if you think about it too much. It follows Donnie Darko, an extremely troubled teenager, who sees a six foot rabbit called Frank who tells him that the world is going to end in twenty eight days. Is it all in his head or could his vision come true?
REQUIEM FOR A DREAM A powerful film about addiction with a soundtrack that complements it well. There are four intertwining stories of drug addiction as each individual is forced to face up to the reality of their situation. Great performances from Jared Leto, Ellen Burstyn and Jennifer Connelly.
The Disadvantages of Being Single
There may be plenty of reasons to enjoy being single, but not everyone is able to embrace the single lifestyle with enthusiasm. If you've just been dumped, having been in a relationship for a considerable period of time, it is hard to see the positive side of being single. Indeed, you simply end up focusing on all the disadvantages, which is easy to do when you have been forced to adapt to living on your own and you're feeling depressed and lonely.
You may be the kind of person who always needs someone there to reassure you and to make you feel good about yourself, which is hard to deal with when you’re single. When you're in a relationship at least you always have someone who cares for you and who you care about. You are able to ask them their opinion and it is the only one that actually matters; if your boyfriend or girlfriend thinks you look good then you think you look good. In most cases your other half knows when to be tactful and when to be blunt, so that you can trust what they have to say.
When you're single, however, you usually live on your own and have no one to ask whether or not you look attractive in the clothes you're wearing. Indeed, you have no one to make an effort for when it comes to your appearance so you may be tempted to let yourself go a bit, piling on the pounds and wearing scruffy clothes. If you're determined to find someone else quickly you may go in completely the opposite direction and lose a few pounds and put yourself out there so you can attract someone else.
The main disadvantage of being single is probably the loneliness that accompanies it and so it is understandable why you would want to get back into a relationship as soon as possible. Although seeing someone else may distract you from your loneliness and prevent you dwelling on the past, sometimes you need a break to get over the end of a relationship, especially if it is one you were in for a long time.
You may have convinced yourself that you need to be in a relationship to be happy, but you shouldn’t have to rely on the presence of someone else in your life to make you feel more complete as a person. Not everyone is cut out for the single life, though, and the dating scene can be tough, but it’s just something you have to get used to if you are ever going to meet someone else.
You may be the kind of person who always needs someone there to reassure you and to make you feel good about yourself, which is hard to deal with when you’re single. When you're in a relationship at least you always have someone who cares for you and who you care about. You are able to ask them their opinion and it is the only one that actually matters; if your boyfriend or girlfriend thinks you look good then you think you look good. In most cases your other half knows when to be tactful and when to be blunt, so that you can trust what they have to say.
When you're single, however, you usually live on your own and have no one to ask whether or not you look attractive in the clothes you're wearing. Indeed, you have no one to make an effort for when it comes to your appearance so you may be tempted to let yourself go a bit, piling on the pounds and wearing scruffy clothes. If you're determined to find someone else quickly you may go in completely the opposite direction and lose a few pounds and put yourself out there so you can attract someone else.
The main disadvantage of being single is probably the loneliness that accompanies it and so it is understandable why you would want to get back into a relationship as soon as possible. Although seeing someone else may distract you from your loneliness and prevent you dwelling on the past, sometimes you need a break to get over the end of a relationship, especially if it is one you were in for a long time.
You may have convinced yourself that you need to be in a relationship to be happy, but you shouldn’t have to rely on the presence of someone else in your life to make you feel more complete as a person. Not everyone is cut out for the single life, though, and the dating scene can be tough, but it’s just something you have to get used to if you are ever going to meet someone else.
Social Effects of the Industrial Revolution
The 'Industrial revolution' had a huge impact on society from the late eighteenth century onwards. Industrialisation was driven by innovation in technology and the use of steam power, and had an extremely significant impact on the economy and the demographic make-up of all countries. Industrialisation had gained the most ground in the United Kingdom by the nineteenth century, and so the social effects of industrialisation were felt there sooner than elsewhere. Urbanisation, the formal creation of class' as a concept, over-crowding, disease, political strife and labour movements were all a feature of the nineteenth century, and were often directly linked to the scale of industrialisation that had taken place in seemingly such a short time.
Technology and increasing levels of efficiency in the countryside meant that fewer workers were needed to work on farms, meaning that more and more people were moving to towns to find work. Increasingly work in urban centres was being concentrated in factories, with work generally involving the use of machinery, often requiring the completion of simple, monotonous tasks, rather than completing the whole process of manufacture. Working conditions were poor, hours were long, and workers were vulnerable to exploitation, particularly women and children. In the United Kingdom the government took steps towards reducing work hours and preventing children from being exploited by ruthless employers. Such actions may not have resulted from a hearty compassion for workers (although it may have been so with regards to children), but out of a fear that a socialist revolution would take hold of the country, particularly with such a high concentration of people in one area. This is partially why the idea of educating the working class was anathema to many middle- and upper-class individuals, as it was feared that they would be drawn to revolutionary texts, such as the Communist Manifesto.
The idea of class had indeed been formalised. Society was at its most divided. You were either a ruler or the ruled. Few working class children were able to attend school (at least not in the earlier part of the nineteenth century), and there was little chance of progression for such people. The period did epitomise a high point for the middle classes, though; the business and shop owners, the political figures and the intelligentsia. They were having increasing influence in public life, replacing the aristocracy at the higher echelons of society.
Whilst the middle classes were influencing society as political figures or writers, the working classes began arranging themselves into unions. The establishment was initially hostile to such organisations, but eventually realised it was better for workers to be fighting for their rights through strikes as opposed to open revolution. Working-class solidarity on issues such as work conditions and hours was the only way in which they could effect change. The industrial revolution had meant that their jobs were not assessed in terms of skill; these workers were basically disposable, meaning that they had an insecure existence and were forced to live from day-to-day. There was no safety net.
Consequently, social ills abounded. Mental illness was prevalent, as were the issues of homelessness, squalor, disease, prostitution and crime, and destitution more generally. The governing principles of the time revolved around laissez faire, and so the British government were not prepared to step in at this time to help those without work and those on the street. Often this responsibility fell to local authorities, who were unable to tackle such social problems on any meaningful scale. The industrial revolution had created jobs in towns, but during recession people were laid off, and there had been no preparation for such an event. The government seemed to believe that its main concern was to prevent revolution, not to tackle the underlying problems of the system.
There were also some social benefits to industrialisation; towns were being modernised and sewage systems developed, transport systems were being developed meaning it was easier to travel throughout the country as well across the world, plus there was a real belief in social mobility and in self-improvement, even if the reality was harder to live up to than the ideal.
The significance of the social effects of industrialisation comes not so much from the effects themselves, but rather in how governments had not prepared themselves for such developments, and were ill-equipped to deal with problems when they arose. The industrial revolution was a driving force for change, but it certainly did not provide all of the answers to the problems that it helped create.
Technology and increasing levels of efficiency in the countryside meant that fewer workers were needed to work on farms, meaning that more and more people were moving to towns to find work. Increasingly work in urban centres was being concentrated in factories, with work generally involving the use of machinery, often requiring the completion of simple, monotonous tasks, rather than completing the whole process of manufacture. Working conditions were poor, hours were long, and workers were vulnerable to exploitation, particularly women and children. In the United Kingdom the government took steps towards reducing work hours and preventing children from being exploited by ruthless employers. Such actions may not have resulted from a hearty compassion for workers (although it may have been so with regards to children), but out of a fear that a socialist revolution would take hold of the country, particularly with such a high concentration of people in one area. This is partially why the idea of educating the working class was anathema to many middle- and upper-class individuals, as it was feared that they would be drawn to revolutionary texts, such as the Communist Manifesto.
The idea of class had indeed been formalised. Society was at its most divided. You were either a ruler or the ruled. Few working class children were able to attend school (at least not in the earlier part of the nineteenth century), and there was little chance of progression for such people. The period did epitomise a high point for the middle classes, though; the business and shop owners, the political figures and the intelligentsia. They were having increasing influence in public life, replacing the aristocracy at the higher echelons of society.
Whilst the middle classes were influencing society as political figures or writers, the working classes began arranging themselves into unions. The establishment was initially hostile to such organisations, but eventually realised it was better for workers to be fighting for their rights through strikes as opposed to open revolution. Working-class solidarity on issues such as work conditions and hours was the only way in which they could effect change. The industrial revolution had meant that their jobs were not assessed in terms of skill; these workers were basically disposable, meaning that they had an insecure existence and were forced to live from day-to-day. There was no safety net.
Consequently, social ills abounded. Mental illness was prevalent, as were the issues of homelessness, squalor, disease, prostitution and crime, and destitution more generally. The governing principles of the time revolved around laissez faire, and so the British government were not prepared to step in at this time to help those without work and those on the street. Often this responsibility fell to local authorities, who were unable to tackle such social problems on any meaningful scale. The industrial revolution had created jobs in towns, but during recession people were laid off, and there had been no preparation for such an event. The government seemed to believe that its main concern was to prevent revolution, not to tackle the underlying problems of the system.
There were also some social benefits to industrialisation; towns were being modernised and sewage systems developed, transport systems were being developed meaning it was easier to travel throughout the country as well across the world, plus there was a real belief in social mobility and in self-improvement, even if the reality was harder to live up to than the ideal.
The significance of the social effects of industrialisation comes not so much from the effects themselves, but rather in how governments had not prepared themselves for such developments, and were ill-equipped to deal with problems when they arose. The industrial revolution was a driving force for change, but it certainly did not provide all of the answers to the problems that it helped create.
The Importance of Cooperation in the Workplace
Cooperation is an essential feature of any workplace, as without it nothing would ever get done. Employees need to collaborate in order to decide how to approach a task and to ensure that everyone knows what their role is. There needs to be compromise and cooperation, because otherwise everything would descend into chaos, with everyone trying to get their point across, shouting increasingly louder to be heard. Cooperation enables a workplace to function much more effectively, as everyone is focused on working together to achieve the same goal.
It doesn't matter how big or small a company is, without any form of cooperation it is unlikely to survive. A successful company requires all of its employees to know what their roles are and to fulfil those roles. There has to be dialogue between different sections of the company, because if they all try to work in isolation problems will most probably arise. Without communication and cooperation on important business matters, confusion can spring up, making it difficult for everyone working for that particular company to continue producing high-quality work.
Sometimes, cooperation can be difficult to achieve in a company, especially amongst those higher up the chain of command, where competition is rife. Egos tend to get in the way of cooperation, as everyone wants to make their mark on the company and be rewarded for showing initiative. At the end of the day, though, if the company is going to expand, increase its profits, launch a new product and make a name for itself, there will have to be a degree of cooperation. Without cooperation, no decisions would ever be taken, which would result in the company going nowhere fast.
Even those lower down the chain have to find a way to cooperate, though, since without cooperation, nobody would take on their share of the workload, which would lead to arguments and nothing much being accomplished. Whether in an office, factory or shop, employees have to be able to cooperate with one another so that whatever the tasks they have are, they are completed to a high standard and on time. Those at the top of a company need to be able to cooperate with those at the bottom and vice-versa, as everyone ought to be working towards the same objectives.
The importance of cooperation in the workplace should not be underestimated, as a cooperative environment is likely to lead to a happier and more productive workforce that can therefore benefit a company's performance.
It doesn't matter how big or small a company is, without any form of cooperation it is unlikely to survive. A successful company requires all of its employees to know what their roles are and to fulfil those roles. There has to be dialogue between different sections of the company, because if they all try to work in isolation problems will most probably arise. Without communication and cooperation on important business matters, confusion can spring up, making it difficult for everyone working for that particular company to continue producing high-quality work.
Sometimes, cooperation can be difficult to achieve in a company, especially amongst those higher up the chain of command, where competition is rife. Egos tend to get in the way of cooperation, as everyone wants to make their mark on the company and be rewarded for showing initiative. At the end of the day, though, if the company is going to expand, increase its profits, launch a new product and make a name for itself, there will have to be a degree of cooperation. Without cooperation, no decisions would ever be taken, which would result in the company going nowhere fast.
Even those lower down the chain have to find a way to cooperate, though, since without cooperation, nobody would take on their share of the workload, which would lead to arguments and nothing much being accomplished. Whether in an office, factory or shop, employees have to be able to cooperate with one another so that whatever the tasks they have are, they are completed to a high standard and on time. Those at the top of a company need to be able to cooperate with those at the bottom and vice-versa, as everyone ought to be working towards the same objectives.
The importance of cooperation in the workplace should not be underestimated, as a cooperative environment is likely to lead to a happier and more productive workforce that can therefore benefit a company's performance.
The Negative Effects of Technology on Kids
Children growing up in today's society probably cannot even remember a time when the internet did not exist, when cassette players were used to listen to music, or when the Sega Mega Drive was the must-have Christmas gift. Technology changes extremely quickly, so that as soon as a person has bought the latest model DVD player or computer there is a new, more advanced version available for double the cost. However, it is because technology is moving so fast that prices are being driven down, making such items more widely available. This is not always good news, though, particularly where children are concerned.
It may be a good thing that children are so technologically savvy that they are able to get online with greater ease than their parents probably can, as the economy is very much dependent on computer technology. Children are therefore potentially better placed to find a job when they are older, as using technology will come naturally to them. However, it also means that when they are suddenly without technology it can be difficult for them to cope. If there is a power cut or something breaks children often don't know what to do with themselves, as they are so used to playing computer games or watching television that they don't know how else to keep busy.
Much of children's spare time is dominated by technology. When they are at school children are often expected to use computers, but even when they come home they usually have to go online to do their homework, and as soon as they have done that they play computer games or watch DVDs. In the past children would have spent their free time reading books, and thus taking an active role in processing information, rather than taking a passive role by taking part in activities such as watching television.
If children weren't reading they would have been playing outside with their friends, and it is no coincidence that as technology has dramatically improved, obesity has started to become more of a problem for youngsters as they are not doing enough exercise.
As owning a particular technological innovation becomes the norm, there is more pressure on children to possess such gizmos, or else feel like an outsider amongst their peers. However, not everyone can afford to have the latest mobile phone or mp3 player, even as prices are tumbling, which can affect children. Children whose parents cannot afford to buy them a phone can feel like outsiders and find that they are picked on for being poor, which is clearly not good for their self-esteem. It also demonstrates that technology has become so entrenched in people's everyday lives that it sets those who do not have access to this technology apart, whether they are children or adults.
Technology has a positive role to play in society, but it can also have a detrimental impact on children if they fail to realise that owning the latest gadgets and gizmos is not the be all and end all of life, which it is clearly up to their parents to relay to them.
It may be a good thing that children are so technologically savvy that they are able to get online with greater ease than their parents probably can, as the economy is very much dependent on computer technology. Children are therefore potentially better placed to find a job when they are older, as using technology will come naturally to them. However, it also means that when they are suddenly without technology it can be difficult for them to cope. If there is a power cut or something breaks children often don't know what to do with themselves, as they are so used to playing computer games or watching television that they don't know how else to keep busy.
Much of children's spare time is dominated by technology. When they are at school children are often expected to use computers, but even when they come home they usually have to go online to do their homework, and as soon as they have done that they play computer games or watch DVDs. In the past children would have spent their free time reading books, and thus taking an active role in processing information, rather than taking a passive role by taking part in activities such as watching television.
If children weren't reading they would have been playing outside with their friends, and it is no coincidence that as technology has dramatically improved, obesity has started to become more of a problem for youngsters as they are not doing enough exercise.
As owning a particular technological innovation becomes the norm, there is more pressure on children to possess such gizmos, or else feel like an outsider amongst their peers. However, not everyone can afford to have the latest mobile phone or mp3 player, even as prices are tumbling, which can affect children. Children whose parents cannot afford to buy them a phone can feel like outsiders and find that they are picked on for being poor, which is clearly not good for their self-esteem. It also demonstrates that technology has become so entrenched in people's everyday lives that it sets those who do not have access to this technology apart, whether they are children or adults.
Technology has a positive role to play in society, but it can also have a detrimental impact on children if they fail to realise that owning the latest gadgets and gizmos is not the be all and end all of life, which it is clearly up to their parents to relay to them.
Negative Effects of the Internet
Technology has undoubtedly improved everybody's lives, making it is easier and quicker to perform certain tasks and generally contributing to a better standard of living. The internet is one invention which has transformed lives, and has had such a revolutionary impact that it has completely re-configured the way in which people view the world. There have been many positives to come out of the expansion of the internet, but like all good things, the internet has also had some negative effects.
It seems that there is a reliance on the internet which formerly had not been an issue. Many forms which are required to be filled in are only available online, whilst some companies only deal with customers online, making it increasingly difficult to find an actual person to talk to. Indeed, the internet has proved to have negative effects when it comes to human relationships in general. People are more interested in engaging with others in chat rooms and forums than meeting people in the 'real' world, and so it can become harder to deal with people in actual social situations.
Some individuals become addicted to the internet, thus jeopardising their own relationships, as their need to access the internet takes control of their life. This is particularly visible in the rise of pornography. There is so much free pornography available, making it much easier to access. Increasing numbers of people have become addicted to pornography, partially as a result of the ease with which they can view such material. The ubiquitous nature of pornography also means that children are able to view films and images of a sexual nature, although parental controls can be implemented.
Children today do not even remember a time when the internet did not exist, and so their whole perception of relationships, social interaction, and accessing information is shaped by their exposure to the internet. Social interactions are increasingly being conducted through technology, whether through text messaging or email, seeming almost to dehumanise social contacts. The internet has made the whole world accessible to everybody, but at the same time it has made it seem less real.
Children and adults can make 'friends' with someone half-way around the world, but are they 'real' friends? After all, most people who meet through social networking sites never meet, relying on instant messaging to communicate, and people are not necessarily who they say they are. Although people can lie in person, there is something less sinister about getting to know people's flaws by talking face-to-face, rather than communicating through a computer. Indeed, there is an 'underground' bad-land within cyber space, where people with perverse interests lurk.
There are adults prepared to portray themselves as something they are not, in order to attract children, who they are then able to 'groom'. The internet has provided a forum for this kind of abuse, and has enabled paedophiles to be able to find each other and share images, which would have been much more difficult in the past.
However, just because the internet has had a negative impact on some areas of people's lives, this should not be allowed to overshadow the overwhelming benefits and opportunities which the growth of the internet has provided. Ultimately, the positives of the internet far outweigh the negatives.
It seems that there is a reliance on the internet which formerly had not been an issue. Many forms which are required to be filled in are only available online, whilst some companies only deal with customers online, making it increasingly difficult to find an actual person to talk to. Indeed, the internet has proved to have negative effects when it comes to human relationships in general. People are more interested in engaging with others in chat rooms and forums than meeting people in the 'real' world, and so it can become harder to deal with people in actual social situations.
Some individuals become addicted to the internet, thus jeopardising their own relationships, as their need to access the internet takes control of their life. This is particularly visible in the rise of pornography. There is so much free pornography available, making it much easier to access. Increasing numbers of people have become addicted to pornography, partially as a result of the ease with which they can view such material. The ubiquitous nature of pornography also means that children are able to view films and images of a sexual nature, although parental controls can be implemented.
Children today do not even remember a time when the internet did not exist, and so their whole perception of relationships, social interaction, and accessing information is shaped by their exposure to the internet. Social interactions are increasingly being conducted through technology, whether through text messaging or email, seeming almost to dehumanise social contacts. The internet has made the whole world accessible to everybody, but at the same time it has made it seem less real.
Children and adults can make 'friends' with someone half-way around the world, but are they 'real' friends? After all, most people who meet through social networking sites never meet, relying on instant messaging to communicate, and people are not necessarily who they say they are. Although people can lie in person, there is something less sinister about getting to know people's flaws by talking face-to-face, rather than communicating through a computer. Indeed, there is an 'underground' bad-land within cyber space, where people with perverse interests lurk.
There are adults prepared to portray themselves as something they are not, in order to attract children, who they are then able to 'groom'. The internet has provided a forum for this kind of abuse, and has enabled paedophiles to be able to find each other and share images, which would have been much more difficult in the past.
However, just because the internet has had a negative impact on some areas of people's lives, this should not be allowed to overshadow the overwhelming benefits and opportunities which the growth of the internet has provided. Ultimately, the positives of the internet far outweigh the negatives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)